In a previous column I had written about how the English are
using the 2012 Olympics to practise their three favourite sports: complaining,
expecting the worst and cursing the authorities. However, the Games proceeded smoothly,
bookended by charming opening and closing ceremonies; security was competent;
the weather held up by London standards (meaning no more than a few hours of
rain each day); and commuters never found it easier to get to work. But most
important, Great Britain won medals. And Britons have suddenly switched from “despondency
to delight”, according to George Cohen of The New York Times. The Economist
contrasts the pre-Olympics pessimism about “bungling bureaucracy; national
humiliation (and) rain” changing to elation as “the country crescendoed, like a
table of diners singing ‘happy birthday’ in a crowded restaurant”. And in the
Financial Times, Lucy Kellaway writes that her earlier pessimism about the
Olympics “was the biggest pile of hogwash I’ve ever written” and she wants to
“retract every whiny, ill-judged, scaremongering word of it”.
I wondered about my English friend Henry Smith, the die-hard
prophet of gloom, who had whinged to me two weeks ago about how the Olympics
was making life miserable for the commuter (as “transport is in shambles:
subway plans are an utter chaos and the bus services are in absolute
disarray”), the small businessman (who could be “prosecuted and fined for using
the word ‘Olympics’”) and the hapless construction job-seeker (because “construction
jobs were taken up by Lithuanians, Romanians and Czechs”). I called him to find
out if he was also singing a different tune.
“Hi Henry,” I said, “How were the Olympics?”
“Great! Superb!” he cried. “Couldn’t be better!” he added to
drive the point home.